Colorado Rapids U20

4 Jun 2033
Saturday
Process
Squad Staff Tactics Scouting Schedule Stats Transfers

Scouting Department

Active Scouts
5
Monitored
12
Report Ready
0
Open Assignments
1
Meetings (90d)
16
Shortlisted
0
Rejected/Blocked
11
Avg Confidence
42%

Scout Workload

5
Name Role Active Report Ready Confidence Last Observed Regions
Scout 3 0 43% 12.07.2027 North America
Scout 3 0 40% 01.08.2028 North AmericaSouth America
Scout 3 0 40% 03.08.2026 North AmericaSouth America
Scout 2 0 40% 03.08.2026 North AmericaSouth America
Scout 1 0 54% 03.08.2026

Active Monitoring

12
Player Position Age Club Scout Source Status Started Last Observed Watched Matches CA PA Confidence Role Fit Value Request Latest Vote Decision Risk
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting — — Staff Tip Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 139 125 54% 100% 250.0K — — —
Omir Fernandez MR 34 Real Salt Lake Staff Tip Active 12.07.2027 12.07.2027 1 0 102 95 48% 100% 1.8M — — —
Emmanuel Gómez Riga GK 31 Alvarado Transfer Request Active 01.08.2028 01.08.2028 1 0 128 123 40% 88% 1.4M #31 GK — —
Olwethu Makhanya DC 29 Philadelphia Union Transfer Request Active 16.02.2027 16.02.2027 1 0 110 129 40% 97% 5.8M #4 DL — —
Elías Báez DL 28 Atlanta United FC Transfer Request Active 16.02.2027 16.02.2027 1 0 119 107 40% 101% 5.2M #4 DL — —
Franco Ortellado DC 32 Sportivo Trinidense Transfer Request Active 04.08.2026 04.08.2026 1 0 107 100 40% 92% 2.8M #2 DM — —
Steven Moreira DR 38 Columbus Crew Transfer Request Active 04.08.2026 04.08.2026 1 0 114 117 40% 105% 1.7M #2 DM — — Age
Diego Osio DC 36 Deportivo La Guaira Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 116 113 40% 103% 2.0M #1 DC — —
Jesús Bueno DM 34 Philadelphia Union Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 117 106 40% 103% 4.9M #1 DC — —
Ryan Porteous DC 34 Los Angeles Football Club Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 114 120 40% 102% 2.8M #1 DC — —
Shaq Moore DR 36 FC Dallas Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 101 109 40% 108% 5.0M #3 DC — —
Miguel Araujo DC 38 Sporting Cristal Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 114 114 40% 108% 2.9M #3 DC — — Age

Scouting Reports

11
Player Position Club Assignment Request Recommendation CA PA Confidence Role Fit Value Risk Origin
Ryan Porteous DC Los Angeles Football Club #1 — Strong Buy 114 120 40% 102% 2.8M Active
Olwethu Makhanya DC Philadelphia Union #4 — Strong Buy 110 129 40% 97% 5.8M Active
Miguel Araujo DC Sporting Cristal #3 — Buy 114 114 40% 108% 2.9M Age Active
Steven Moreira DR Columbus Crew #2 — Buy 114 117 40% 105% 1.7M Age Active
Emmanuel Gómez Riga GK Alvarado #6 — Consider 128 123 40% 88% 1.4M Active
Tarık Çetin GK Fortaleza CEIF #6 — Consider 125 112 40% 93% 900.0K Age Active
Elías Báez DL Atlanta United FC #4 — Consider 119 107 40% 101% 5.2M Active
Jesús Bueno DM Philadelphia Union #1 — Consider 117 106 40% 103% 4.9M Active
Diego Osio DC Deportivo La Guaira #1 — Consider 116 113 40% 103% 2.0M Active
Franco Ortellado DC Sportivo Trinidense #2 — Consider 107 100 40% 92% 2.8M Active
Shaq Moore DR FC Dallas #3 — Consider 101 109 40% 108% 5.0M Active

Scouting Assignments

1
# Request Position Min CA Age Max Budget Scout Obs Reports Status Role Profile
#5 #18 ST 156 21–29 741.2K 0 0 Active T 13.0 · M 10.0 · P 11.0

Match Scouting Assignments

10
Scout Target Team Linked Last Attended
New England Revolution U18 #5, #6 23.04.2033
Nashville SC U20 #2, #4
LA Galaxy U20 #2, #4
New England Revolution U20 #2, #4
Columbus Crew U20 #4
Vancouver Whitecaps U20 #4
Orlando City U20 #4
DC United U20 #5, #6
Portland Timbers U20 #5, #6
CF Montreal U20 #5

Recruitment Meetings

16
11.03.2030 #42
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Brandan Craig Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2880000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Tahir Reid-Brown Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 650000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
04.03.2030 #41
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Brandan Craig Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2880000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Tahir Reid-Brown Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 650000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
25.02.2030 #40
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Brandan Craig Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2880000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Tahir Reid-Brown Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 650000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
18.02.2030 #39
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Brandan Craig Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2880000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Tahir Reid-Brown Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 650000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
30.07.2029 #38
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Brandan Craig Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2880000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Tahir Reid-Brown Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 650000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
23.07.2029 #37
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Brandan Craig Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2880000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Tahir Reid-Brown Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 650000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
16.07.2029 #36
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Tahir Reid-Brown Reject — -0.91 — — 1.50 650000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Fafà Picault Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Brandan Craig Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2880000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Scout Votes
Scout Player Vote Score Confidence Reason
Tahir Reid-Brown Reject -0.91 65% Too Expensive
09.07.2029 #35
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Brandan Craig Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2880000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
23.04.2029 #34
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Brandan Craig Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.17 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.06 Split or insufficient confidence
16.04.2029 #33
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Brandan Craig Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.17 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.06 Split or insufficient confidence
09.04.2029 #32
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Brandan Craig Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.17 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.06 Split or insufficient confidence
02.04.2029 #31
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Brandan Craig Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.17 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.06 Split or insufficient confidence
26.03.2029 #30
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Brandan Craig Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.17 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.06 Split or insufficient confidence
19.03.2029 #29
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Brandan Craig Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.17 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.06 Split or insufficient confidence
12.03.2029 #28
Participants: Scout Scout Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Brandan Craig Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.17 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.06 Split or insufficient confidence
05.03.2029 #27
Participants: Scout Scout Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Fafà Picault Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Brandan Craig Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.17 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 1.06 Split or insufficient confidence

Known Players

0
No persistent player memory recorded yet.

Shadow Reports

0
No shadow reports carried over.

Transfer Requests

16
# Position Priority Reason Min CA Ideal CA Age Budget Status Named Target Board
#12 DC Optional Depth Cover 99 109 20–32 — Negotiating — —
#13 GK Optional Depth Cover 139 149 20–32 — Negotiating — —
#14 MC Optional Depth Cover 147 157 20–32 — Negotiating — —
#18 ST Important Quality Upgrade 156 169 21–29 741.2K Scouting — —
#7 DC Optional Depth Cover 90 100 20–32 — Fulfilled — —
#8 DC Optional Depth Cover 95 105 20–32 — Fulfilled — —
#10 DC Optional Depth Cover 97 107 20–32 — Fulfilled — —
#1 DC Optional Staff Tip 104 109 18–32 308.7K Abandoned — —
#2 DM Optional Staff Tip 102 107 18–32 308.7K Abandoned — —
#3 DC Optional Staff Tip 105 110 18–32 308.7K Abandoned — —
#4 DL Optional Staff Tip 89 94 18–32 308.7K Abandoned — —
#5 DC Optional Depth Cover 88 98 20–32 — Abandoned — —
#6 DC Optional Depth Cover 90 100 20–32 — Abandoned — —
#9 DC Optional Depth Cover 95 105 20–32 — Abandoned — —
#11 DC Optional Depth Cover 97 107 20–32 — Abandoned — —
#31 GK Optional Staff Tip 96 101 18–32 494.1K Abandoned Tarık Çetin ✗