Houston Dynamo U20

4 Jun 2033
Saturday
Process
Squad Staff Tactics Scouting Schedule Stats Transfers

Scouting Department

Active Scouts
2
Monitored
3
Report Ready
0
Open Assignments
2
Meetings (90d)
16
Shortlisted
0
Rejected/Blocked
12
Avg Confidence
43%

Scout Workload

2
Name Role Active Report Ready Confidence Last Observed Regions
Scout 2 0 40% 01.03.2033 North America
Scout 1 0 48% 03.08.2026

Active Monitoring

3
Player Position Age Club Scout Source Status Started Last Observed Watched Matches CA PA Confidence Role Fit Value Request Latest Vote Decision Risk
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting — — Staff Tip Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 111 132 48% 100% 250.0K — — —
Jack Kortkamp GK 25 Sporting Kansas City Transfer Request Active 01.03.2033 01.03.2033 1 0 158 159 40% 102% 8.9M #8 GK — —
Kevin Kelsy ST 28 Portland Timbers Transfer Request Active 02.08.2026 02.08.2026 1 0 120 123 40% 99% 3.4M #1 ST — —

Scouting Reports

8
Player Position Club Assignment Request Recommendation CA PA Confidence Role Fit Value Risk Origin
Mateo Silvetti MR Inter Miami CF #6 — Strong Buy 120 140 40% 110% 13.0M Active
Antony AMR Portland Timbers #8 — Strong Buy 117 123 40% 105% 15.0M Active
Jack Kortkamp GK Sporting Kansas City #4 #8 Buy 158 159 40% 102% 8.9M Active
Kevin Kelsy ST Portland Timbers #1 — Buy 120 123 40% 99% 3.4M Active
Marcus Ingvartsen AMR San Diego Football Club #7 — Buy 109 111 40% 100% 2.7M Age Active
Julián Fernández AMR New York City #8 — Buy 109 114 40% 102% 9.8M Active
Henadii Synchuk AMR CF Montreal #6 — Buy 102 109 40% 98% 7.8M Active
Amin Boudri MC Los Angeles Football Club #7 — Consider 134 115 40% 106% 14.0M Active

Scouting Assignments

3
# Request Position Min CA Age Max Budget Scout Obs Reports Status Role Profile
#5 #15 ST 156 21–29 10.7M — 0 0 Active T 13.0 · M 10.0 · P 11.0
#9 #37 MC 154 21–29 10.7M — 0 0 Active T 12.0 · M 12.0 · P 10.0
#4 #8 GK 146 21–29 594.0K 1 1 Completed T 8.0 · M 12.0 · P 10.0

Match Scouting Assignments

8
Scout Target Team Linked Last Attended
Nashville SC U20 #2, #3
Orlando City U20 #1, #2
Philadelphia Union U20 #1, #2
LA Galaxy U20 #2, #3
New England Revolution U20 #2, #3
Portland Timbers U20 #4
Real Salt Lake U20 #4
Charlotte Football Club U20 #4

Recruitment Meetings

16
11.03.2030 #41
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Amahl Pellegrino Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Andrés Cubas Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
04.03.2030 #40
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Amahl Pellegrino Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Andrés Cubas Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
25.02.2030 #39
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Amahl Pellegrino Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Andrés Cubas Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
18.02.2030 #38
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Amahl Pellegrino Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Andrés Cubas Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
30.07.2029 #37
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Amahl Pellegrino Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Andrés Cubas Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
23.07.2029 #36
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Amahl Pellegrino Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Andrés Cubas Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
16.07.2029 #35
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Amahl Pellegrino Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Andrés Cubas Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
09.07.2029 #34
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Andrés Cubas Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Léiner Escalante Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Amahl Pellegrino Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 150000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
23.04.2029 #33
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.04 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.05 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
16.04.2029 #32
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.04 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.05 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
09.04.2029 #31
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.04 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.05 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
02.04.2029 #30
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.04 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.05 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
26.03.2029 #29
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.04 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.05 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
19.03.2029 #28
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.04 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.05 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
12.03.2029 #27
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.04 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.05 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
05.03.2029 #26
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Léiner Escalante Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.04 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.05 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.00 Split or insufficient confidence

Known Players

0
No persistent player memory recorded yet.

Shadow Reports

0
No shadow reports carried over.

Transfer Requests

12
# Position Priority Reason Min CA Ideal CA Age Budget Status Named Target Board
#6 DC Optional Depth Cover 109 119 20–32 — Negotiating — —
#8 GK Important Quality Upgrade 146 159 21–29 594.0K Scouting — —
#15 ST Important Quality Upgrade 156 169 21–29 10.7M Scouting — —
#37 MC Important Quality Upgrade 154 167 21–29 10.7M Scouting — —
#3 ST Optional Depth Cover 99 109 20–32 1.5M Fulfilled Ezekiel Kwame Alladoh ✗
#5 DC Optional Depth Cover 104 114 20–32 — Fulfilled — —
#7 MC Optional Depth Cover 138 148 20–32 — Fulfilled — —
#34 AML Optional Staff Tip 103 108 18–32 7.2M Fulfilled — —
#1 ST Optional Depth Cover 99 109 20–32 1.5M Abandoned Danny Musovski ✗
#2 DC Optional Development 83 108 16–21 751.8K Abandoned Rudy Camacho ✓
#16 AMR Optional Staff Tip 103 108 18–32 7.2M Abandoned — —
#25 AMR Optional Staff Tip 103 108 18–32 7.2M Abandoned — —