Chicago Fire

American Major League Soccer
4 Jun 2033
Saturday
Process
Squad Staff Tactics Finances Scouting Academy Schedule Stats Transfers

Scouting Department

Active Scouts
4
Monitored
7
Report Ready
0
Open Assignments
1
Meetings (90d)
16
Shortlisted
0
Rejected/Blocked
11
Avg Confidence
45%

Scout Workload

4
Name Role Active Report Ready Confidence Last Observed Regions
Scout 3 0 40% 03.08.2026 North America
Scout 2 0 58% 17.07.2028 North America
Scout 1 0 40% 03.08.2026 North Africa
Scout 1 0 40% 03.08.2026 North America

Active Monitoring

7
Player Position Age Club Scout Source Status Started Last Observed Watched Matches CA PA Confidence Role Fit Value Request Latest Vote Decision Risk
Amahl Pellegrino — — Staff Tip Active 17.07.2028 17.07.2028 1 0 110 113 76% 100% 150.0K — Approve Keep Monitoring
Gustav Berggren DM 35 New York Red Bulls Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 109 106 40% 107% 5.1M #1 DC — —
Karim El Eraki DR 35 El Masry Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 123 115 40% 114% 2.1M #2 DM — —
Danley Jean-Jacques DM 33 Philadelphia Union Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 107 120 40% 104% 4.6M #3 DC — —
Sebastian Schonlau DC 38 Vancouver Whitecaps Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 112 122 40% 104% 2.1M #3 DC — — Age
Cristian Roldan DM 38 Seattle Sounders Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 128 118 40% 112% 4.6M #3 DC — — Age
Eduard Löwen DM 36 St. Louis CITY SC Transfer Request Active 03.08.2026 03.08.2026 1 0 127 120 40% 111% 5.9M #4 DM — —

Scouting Reports

6
Player Position Club Assignment Request Recommendation CA PA Confidence Role Fit Value Risk Origin
Sebastian Schonlau DC Vancouver Whitecaps #3 — Buy 112 122 40% 104% 2.1M Age Active
Cristian Roldan DM Seattle Sounders #3 — Consider 128 118 40% 112% 4.6M Age Active
Eduard Löwen DM St. Louis CITY SC #4 — Consider 127 120 40% 111% 5.9M Active
Karim El Eraki DR El Masry #2 — Consider 123 115 40% 114% 2.1M Active
Gustav Berggren DM New York Red Bulls #1 — Consider 109 106 40% 107% 5.1M Active
Danley Jean-Jacques DM Philadelphia Union #3 — Consider 107 120 40% 104% 4.6M Active

Scouting Assignments

1
# Request Position Min CA Age Max Budget Scout Obs Reports Status Role Profile
#6 #12 MC 154 21–29 5.4M 0 0 Active T 12.0 · M 12.0 · P 10.0

Match Scouting Assignments

4
Scout Target Team Linked Last Attended
Nashville SC U20 #1, #2, #3, #4
LA Galaxy U20 #1, #2, #3, #4
New England Revolution U20 #1, #2, #3, #4
Colorado Rapids U20 #6

Recruitment Meetings

16
12.03.2029 #33
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Jack Kortkamp Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.11 Split or insufficient confidence
Scout Votes
Scout Player Vote Score Confidence Reason
Amahl Pellegrino Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
05.03.2029 #32
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Jack Kortkamp Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.11 Split or insufficient confidence
Scout Votes
Scout Player Vote Score Confidence Reason
Amahl Pellegrino Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
26.02.2029 #31
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Jack Kortkamp Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.11 Split or insufficient confidence
Scout Votes
Scout Player Vote Score Confidence Reason
Amahl Pellegrino Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
19.02.2029 #30
Participants: Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Jack Kortkamp Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.11 Split or insufficient confidence
Scout Votes
Scout Player Vote Score Confidence Reason
Amahl Pellegrino Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
31.07.2028 #29
Participants: Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Kristoffer Velde Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Jack Kortkamp Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.11 Split or insufficient confidence
Scout Votes
Scout Player Vote Score Confidence Reason
Kristoffer Velde Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
Amahl Pellegrino Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
24.07.2028 #28
Participants: Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Kristoffer Velde Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Jack Kortkamp Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.11 Split or insufficient confidence
Scout Votes
Scout Player Vote Score Confidence Reason
Kristoffer Velde Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
Amahl Pellegrino Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
17.07.2028 #27
Participants: Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Kristoffer Velde Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Amahl Pellegrino Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Jack Kortkamp Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.11 Split or insufficient confidence
Scout Votes
Scout Player Vote Score Confidence Reason
Kristoffer Velde Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
Amahl Pellegrino Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
10.07.2028 #26
Participants: Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Kristoffer Velde Keep Monitoring — 1.23 ✓ — 0.10 0.06 Split or insufficient confidence
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.01 Split or insufficient confidence
Omir Fernandez Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Jack Kortkamp Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.08 Split or insufficient confidence
Paul Arriola Keep Monitoring — 0.00 — — 0.20 0.11 Split or insufficient confidence
Scout Votes
Scout Player Vote Score Confidence Reason
Kristoffer Velde Approve 1.23 76% Role Fit
17.04.2028 #25
Participants: Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 250000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Jack Kortkamp Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
10.04.2028 #24
Participants: Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 250000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Jack Kortkamp Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
03.04.2028 #23
Participants: Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 250000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Jack Kortkamp Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
27.03.2028 #22
Participants: Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 250000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Jack Kortkamp Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
20.03.2028 #21
Participants: Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 250000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Jack Kortkamp Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
13.03.2028 #20
Participants: Scout Scout Scout Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 250000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Jack Kortkamp Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
06.03.2028 #19
Participants: Scout Scout Scout Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 250000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Jack Kortkamp Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
28.02.2028 #18
Participants: Scout Scout Scout Scout Scout
Meeting Decisions
Player Decision Request Consensus Chief Data Board Risk Budget Fit Reason
Eric Maxim Choupo-Moting Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 250000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Omir Fernandez Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Jack Kortkamp Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 1800000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach
Paul Arriola Reject — 0.00 — — 1.50 2600000.00 Votes negative or budget out of reach

Known Players

0
No persistent player memory recorded yet.

Shadow Reports

0
No shadow reports carried over.

Transfer Requests

12
# Position Priority Reason Min CA Ideal CA Age Budget Status Named Target Board
#26 DC Optional Depth Cover 144 154 20–32 — Negotiating — —
#10 GK Important Quality Upgrade 146 159 21–29 5.4M Scouting — —
#12 MC Important Quality Upgrade 154 167 21–29 5.4M Scouting — —
#9 ST Optional Depth Cover 149 159 20–32 — Pending — —
#1 DC Optional Staff Tip 94 99 18–32 387.1K Fulfilled — —
#2 DM Optional Staff Tip 102 107 18–32 387.1K Fulfilled — —
#5 DC Optional Depth Cover 118 128 20–32 — Fulfilled — —
#7 DC Optional Depth Cover 128 138 20–32 — Fulfilled — —
#8 DC Optional Depth Cover 140 150 20–32 — Fulfilled — —
#3 DC Optional Staff Tip 108 113 18–32 387.1K Abandoned — —
#4 DM Optional Staff Tip 97 102 18–32 387.1K Abandoned — —
#6 DC Optional Depth Cover 128 138 20–32 — Abandoned — —